I agree Charlie, Narcissus clearly includes N. pseudonarcissus subsp. pseudonarcissus, which although sometimes found in gardens is not really a garden daffodil.
There is a wider point though. Giving Narcissus the common name Narcissus conveys no additional information (and capitalising the name seems wrong in many cases also), when producing reports I routinely modify the common names of any records at genus (or higher) level to e.g. A narcissus. This tells us that the species is unknown. Giving the common name as Narcissus (capitalised) implies, to me, that the record is of the genus as a whole, not an unidentified member of that genus.
Whenever we raise these issues we are told that such things are in the control of the custodians of the lists. I wonder therefore if it might be possible to create and issue a simple set of guidelines to those custodians agreed by the users and the custodians and specifying how such issues should be presented in the lists.
I know some people might not like it, but it might at least enable the taxon dictionary to be a bit more consistent.
Rob Large
Wildlife Sites Officer
Wiltshire & Swindon Biological Records Centre