Re: The problem with reporting abundance.
WAY too many columns.
Having only recently given up r3 where sex/stage/abundance concatenated into a single field, its a little frustrating reporting from R6 on unknown data.
I have no idea how the abundance information is stored for any particular taxon/sample and so I have to choose evry column under the sun to pull out the appropriate information - which then has to get filtered for a report.
Has anyone sorted out a concatenated string system for this? Or other solution.
Or am I missing something?
M
Tullie House Museum