1 (edited by Lindsay_FifeNature 04-08-2025 09:37:39)

Topic: Arion (Arion) sp.

Mollusc experts in our area want Arion (Arion) sp. to be used in some situations, as recommended by Ben Rowson.  In the online UKSI I've found Arion (Arion) A. Férussac, 1819 (https://www.nhm.ac.uk/our-science/data/ … 0020528105), tagged as recommended and accepted.

However, we can't seem to use it within Recorder 6.  I can find it using the search, but on trying to view the results of the search in the list hierarchy, it gives an error message that it isn't in the list.

Similarly, it doesn't seem to be in iRecord as an option to use either.

Is this because the listing in the UKSI is tagged as ill-formed or will it be something system specific or other reasons behind this?

Thanks for your help.

Lindsay

Lindsay Bamforth
Fife Nature Records Centre,
Information Officer

2

Re: Arion (Arion) sp.

Hi Lindsay, I think the taxon you're looking at it a subgenus and some data-entry forms don't allow ranks like that to be entered. But have you tried "Arion (Arion) agg."? That's a species aggregate around the subgenus and should be equivalent to what you need?

Chris Raper, Manager of the UK Species Inventory, Angela Marmont Centre for UK Biodiversity,
Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD.  (tel: 020 7942 5894)
also Tachinid Recording Scheme (http://tachinidae.org.uk/)

3

Re: Arion (Arion) sp.

Hi Chris,

Thanks for your response.

They had specifically requested Arion (Arion) sp. over a Arion (Arion) agg. suggestion.  Do you think there's likely to be any prospect of Arion (Arion) sp. being an option that can be used in iRecord and Recorder 6?  If not, I'll go back to them and explain the situation and see if Arion (Arion) agg. would be acceptable afterall.

Thanks,

Lindsay

Lindsay Bamforth
Fife Nature Records Centre,
Information Officer