Topic: Repeated notifications
I have noted elsewhere that I have had duplicated notifications of downloads and access requests. This morning I see another example - this time five identical (except for the time stamps, which cover ~7 minutes) entries:
sarah macdonald-smart Mon Nov 25 2013 17:36:59 (GMT) All sensitive and non-sensitive records for Muntiacus reevesi (Ogilby, 1839) Educational purposes interested in muntjac in scotland as i have heard rumours that they are present and wanted to check survey data 1 records from this dataset in this download. This is 0.0% of this dataset and this comprises 0.5% of the download
sarah macdonald-smart Mon Nov 25 2013 17:34:01 (GMT) All sensitive and non-sensitive records for Muntiacus reevesi (Ogilby, 1839) Educational purposes interested in muntjac in scotland as i have heard rumours that they are present and wanted to check survey data 1 records from this dataset in this download. This is 0.0% of this dataset and this comprises 0.5% of the download
sarah macdonald-smart Mon Nov 25 2013 17:31:03 (GMT) All sensitive and non-sensitive records for Muntiacus reevesi (Ogilby, 1839) Educational purposes interested in muntjac in scotland as i have heard rumours that they are present and wanted to check survey data 1 records from this dataset in this download. This is 0.0% of this dataset and this comprises 0.5% of the download
sarah macdonald-smart Mon Nov 25 2013 17:30:16 (GMT) All sensitive and non-sensitive records for Muntiacus reevesi (Ogilby, 1839) Educational purposes interested in muntjac in scotland as i have heard rumours that they are present and wanted to check survey data 1 records from this dataset in this download. This is 0.0% of this dataset and this comprises 0.5% of the download
sarah macdonald-smart Mon Nov 25 2013 17:30:01 (GMT) All sensitive and non-sensitive records for Muntiacus reevesi (Ogilby, 1839) Educational purposes interested in muntjac in scotland as i have heard rumours that they are present and wanted to check survey data 1 records from this dataset in this download. This is 0.0% of this dataset and this comprises 0.5% of the download
No-one, I think, has yet suggested the reason for this.
Is it a problem with the software that handles requests? If so, please correct it.
Are the users making multiple requests? If so, maybe the user should be contacted to determine what she did, and to establish whether the interface needs editing to make clear that a request has been successful and therefore prevent a repeat call.
M.