1

Topic: New English Name Request - Sea Mat

Chris,

Any chance an English name of 'Sea Mat' could be added for the marine bryozoan species - Membranipora membranacea ??

Cheers.

Steve

Steve J. McWilliam
www.rECOrd-LRC.co.uk
www.stevemcwilliam.co.uk/guitar/

2

Re: New English Name Request - Sea Mat

Yes, no problem - added :)

Sea Mat
tvk NHMSYS0021118264

Chris Raper, Manager of the UK Species Inventory, Angela Marmont Centre for UK Biodiversity,
Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD.  (tel: 020 7942 5894)
also Tachinid Recording Scheme (http://tachinidae.org.uk/)

3

Re: New English Name Request - Sea Mat

Thanks Chris - appreciated.

Steve

Steve J. McWilliam
www.rECOrd-LRC.co.uk
www.stevemcwilliam.co.uk/guitar/

4 (edited by stevemcbill 23-10-2014 08:59:29)

Re: New English Name Request - Sea Mat

Chris,

Do names added to the NBN/Recorder Dictionary via this Forum also feed into both the UKSI Sandbox and thence into the formal UKSI ??

Cheers.

Steve

Steve J. McWilliam
www.rECOrd-LRC.co.uk
www.stevemcwilliam.co.uk/guitar/

5

Re: New English Name Request - Sea Mat

Hi Steve

Good question. I probably haven't explained before how it all works so here goes. Anything that is given to me (via any route - here, email, iRecord forum, iSpot forum etc) will go:

* Firstly I make the changes to my master UKSI copy (an Access 2000 database) on my PC in the NHM (and backed up to multiple locations). This database has utilities that help me manage the data fairly easily but it is in need of improvement - something I have been working on.

* Then I copy the master database to my sandbox (a SQL database and PHP website on the NHM servers) on a daily basis so that I can quickly check that the additions work in the way that they should - and to let others check when I have been working on. Nothing is ever amended in the sandbox - it is just a copy used to check the data and it is completely wiped and reloaded each time.

* I usually respond by letting the requester know what I have added (tvks etc) so they can amend their own copy of Recorder and if they have said that they are waiting to add records to iRecord I email the details to John van Breda who amends his copy locally. This just gets users able to enter records quickly.

* When I work on checklists there are often periods when the database couldn't be sent out as a whole because only half the tables have been updated ... it's a rolling work-in-progress. But when there is a point at which everything has been updated and the data integrity checks come up with no errors then I can take a snapshot of the whole database and send that off to Mike Weideli to be added to Recorder6.

* Mike then does his own checks on the data, independently of mine, and if he spots any issues (very rare these days) I correct them and resend until it looks good. When Mike has given it the thumbs up a copy will go to John van Breda (iRecord) and Graham French (NBN Gateway) to be imported to their systems at the next available slot. They obviously work on their own projects so they have to find time to update the taxonomy but it usually happens fairly quickly.

I hope that explains everything :)  It's quite a complex process when you write it down but it all works well and we have been working hard to reduce the time between amendments getting requested and the changes appearing in the data-entry (iRecord, Recorder6) and data-reporting (NBN Gateway) systems :)

Best wishes,
Chris R.

Chris Raper, Manager of the UK Species Inventory, Angela Marmont Centre for UK Biodiversity,
Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD.  (tel: 020 7942 5894)
also Tachinid Recording Scheme (http://tachinidae.org.uk/)

6

Re: New English Name Request - Sea Mat

Many thanks Chris - the description of the process is very much appreciated and clarifies many points of its operation.  Thank you.

Steve

Steve J. McWilliam
www.rECOrd-LRC.co.uk
www.stevemcwilliam.co.uk/guitar/