1

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

As part of the import process I find myself adding quite a few new people. This last one I have has a year of death given as 1968. However R6 refuses to accept it giving the message:

The Date of Death cannot be entered without a Date of Birth.

Balderdash. Do I need a copy of the birth certificate as well? I find this ridiculous. Who thought up that bit of nonsense?

Data Manger
Somerset Environmental Records Centre

2

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

Does it work if you put Unknown as DOB? Only issue may be that it would default to 1/1/1650 on some exports making him 318, or was that a R2002 problem?

Gordon

Gordon Barker
Biological Survey Data Manager
National Trust

3

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

Thanks Gordon. I've already entered the DOB as 1/1/1700 just so I could proceed. The point is still that it should not be mandatory to know a DOB just to say when someone died.

I recall a similar check in R3 early on that suggested that someone was too old if over 70 to make records.

Data Manger
Somerset Environmental Records Centre

4

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

Ha! too old if over 70? That wipes out about half of the recording community then, including my Dad who is well into his 70's still going stronger than ever - see:

http://patrickroper.co.uk

and

http://data.nbn.org.uk/datasetInfo/temporalMetadata.jsp?refID=5&dsKey=GA000655

A sensible solution to the odd requirement for a birth date if there is a death date would for for Recorder to automatically enter 'unknown' if the birth date is left blank. Tony, did you try entering 'unknown' as the birth date?

Charles Roper
Digital Development Manager | Field Studies Council
http://www.field-studies-council.org | https://twitter.com/charlesroper | https://twitter.com/fsc_digital

5

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

Thanks Charles, no I didn't try 'unknown'. But if you do it does give and even more stupid response. "The Date of Birth cannot contain the Date of Death".

I guess the real question is was the programmer concious when at work :-). Certainly there is no logic present.

Data Manger
Somerset Environmental Records Centre

6

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

charlesr wrote:

Ha! too old if over 70? That wipes out about half of the recording community then, including my Dad who is well into his 70's still going stronger than ever - see:

http://patrickroper.co.uk

I was very impressed that he made it onto the Harry Hill' TV Burp review of the year! :cool:

-----------------
Teresa Frost | Wetland Bird Survey National Organiser | BTO
Other hat  | National Forum for Biological Recording Council
(Old hats  | NBN Board, ALERC Board, CBDC, KMBRC)

7

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

So were all my friends - I received a flurry of text messages saying "I just saw your dad on Harry Hill!!!" on boxing day while out with other friends.

Charles Roper
Digital Development Manager | Field Studies Council
http://www.field-studies-council.org | https://twitter.com/charlesroper | https://twitter.com/fsc_digital

8

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

I have checked and like last time I tried, if you enter unknown as DoB, you can't enter anything except unknown as DoD, because the "date of birth cannot contain the date of death"!!!!?

Rob Large
Wildlife Sites Officer
Wiltshire & Swindon Biological Records Centre

9

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

Well to move things along then; perhaps the team should remove DOB and DOD from the model as if after 10 years they do not work there is no likely-hood that they will ever work and would better removed!

Data Manger
Somerset Environmental Records Centre

10

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

It's an issue with the Recorder UI (the validation add-in perhaps?) rather than the model. Although Recorder 200x and 6 have been around for ~10 years, only very few people, relatively speaking, have been using it to its full potential in that time and therefore problems such as this have gone unnoticed. I don't think I've ever entered a date of death without a date of birth before in my 7 or so years using Recorder and so I've never come across this problem before. If I had I would have reported it, as I do with most problems I encounter. If others have encountered this problem, then they have not reported it either. The thing is, if nobody reports a problem like this, then it'll never get fixed!

So, the moral of the story: if you come across a bug or unexpected behaviour with Recorder, report it.

I've just tested this problem re DOD and DOB and can confirm the faulty behaviour. We should be able to enter a DOD without first having to enter a DOB. I would suggest that if a DOD is added without a DOB, the DOB field is automatically populated with the 'unknown' value. Also, manually entering 'unknown' into DOB and then entering a valid date into DOD should not trigger the "Date of Birth cannot contain the Date of Death" prompt.

Charles Roper
Digital Development Manager | Field Studies Council
http://www.field-studies-council.org | https://twitter.com/charlesroper | https://twitter.com/fsc_digital

11

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

Just to note that this issue was flagged here on the forum in March (along with some other strange behaviour with DOD field) but it seems it hasn't been corrected - see thread http://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?id=942.

Mark Pollitt
SWSEIC (formerly DGERC)

12

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

Thanks Mark, I was just about to point that out (since I contributed to that thread also i think)

Rob Large
Wildlife Sites Officer
Wiltshire & Swindon Biological Records Centre

13

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

Mark, I wonder if this issue has been logged? Lynn usually replies when she logs a bug.

This highlights how it would be useful if there were a public bugtracker, so that we can all see when a bug is logged and when it subsequently gets fixed. Or not.

Charles Roper
Digital Development Manager | Field Studies Council
http://www.field-studies-council.org | https://twitter.com/charlesroper | https://twitter.com/fsc_digital

14

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

Dear all, this bug was logged and is on the waiting list to be fixed.

15 (edited by TonyP 12-07-2010 10:42:04)

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

Is there a date for this to be fixed yet?

It still causes me problems. Most notably that people try contacting the dead, because it's not recorded as such. This does tend to distress the living relatives and is an embarrassment.

Of course it also means that people can be 'recording' post death which is a validation issue.

Worth noting that this problem occurs for other dates such as Address From & To where I know when someone left the address but not when they moved to that address.

Data Manger
Somerset Environmental Records Centre

16

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

Another date problem is Location Designation From and To. I'm putting in an SSSI Notification date of 1984 as the From date and get this message;

The start date must be a valid standard date and it cannot be after today's date of 13/07/2010.

Is 1984 not a standard date? The help just says enter a standard date!

Tony

Data Manger
Somerset Environmental Records Centre

17

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

Hi Tony,
The list of bugs and feature requests is currently being proiritised for the next release (after 6.15). When complete I can let you know whether this has been included.

18

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

Thanks Mary, I do have a major concern though. Many of the things I see being wrong at present means that they are likely to never be corrected if and when Recorder is fixed.

I want to be able to correct information when it needs correcting. I have no intention of spending my time making notes of all the items I cannot do because the program does not work now. The whole point is to save time not waste it. I would like to clean my data at and present I can see little point in attempting this task if so many things are on-hold until someone decides it's worth fixing.

I went through this in Recorder3, though of need rather than bugs, and had to develop solutions to deal with things. I guess I was expecting it to be working by now and all I seem to do is find things that no one has tried to do yet or not reported as not working. This is very disheartening. I seem to find something every day I use it, even if they are related. I'm being thwarted at every turn. Funny thing is I was persuaded to not develop my own solution because this was to be so great.

So what £500,000 and 10 years later.......Recorder 6. I know this sounds gloomy but it is I'm spending too much time with problems rather than solutions and am yet to really start using it for it's intended purpose.

Is there someone to write to with our concerns?

Data Manger
Somerset Environmental Records Centre

19

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

Hi Tony,

Yes you can write to Steve Wilkinson, Head of Data Services, JNCC, at the address below.

Best wishes, Mary

JNCC, Monkstone House, City Road, Peterborough, PE1 1JY

20

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

Hi Tony and Mary
An interim solution might be to enter the date of birth as - followed by the date before the date of death. E.g. for a DOD of 1973, enter "- 1972" as the DOB, meaning an unknown time leading to 1972. But I agree this is a horrid solution to a silly niggle.

John van Breda
Biodiverse IT

21

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

Hi Tony,
One more thing I forgot to say. At the moment JNCC are in the process of sorting out the Recorder source code so that it is available to myself as well as Dorset Software, which should happen in the next month or two. Until now, if I have seen a bug, I have not been able to change the code even if I know where the bug is. But once this change happens, it will make it much easier for me to fix these bugs which may be trivial in terms of the changes to the source code, but have a major impact on the usability of the system, without having to wait for the somewhat lengthy process of change management that occurs with bugs at the moment.

So, the good news is hopefully this will improve the situation at least a little in the near future.

John van Breda
Biodiverse IT

22

Re: Date of Death - Not Allowed

John, thanks and that sounds like a brilliant prospect. I can see that could fill a niche that would be extremely useful and of significant value to so many.

Data Manger
Somerset Environmental Records Centre