Re: Error with locations and grid references on import
Hi
I have imported about 100,000 records for use in our local bird atlas project. When I was preparing the maps in DMAP I found that dots for four locations were appearing in the wrong places - obviously so - in the sea and S of our southern boundary.
When I checked to locate the source of the problem I was surprised by what I found. In the Data Entry, Locations, the grid references were correct for each tetrad. The errors were found in Observations, choosing the relevant survey and checking the grid reference against each location. In three cases SJ was stored as SH and in one a grid ref of 9933 had become 9923. I couldn't understand how this had happened.
When importing, the data file has to match all the data held in R6, eg the observer names, the location names and their grid references, etc. So, I can't see how the incorrect grid refs could have been imported. If the errors were not imported how and why should R6 make some unwanted changes to only a few grid refs (but there could be many more, but they don't show up as they are located within the area of our map).
When data were imported, I had assumed that when there was a match with the eg location data held in R6 that the data from the Location files would be used to store against each observation. Is this assumption correct?
If the assumption is not correct, does this mean that errors could creep through on import. When the Import Wizard shows matches for all locations I do not visually check that they are correct. This should not be necessary, but if errors happen on import it will have to become another part of the process.
Can anyone explain:
- how the errors occurred?
- how to prevent them occurring again?
I hope I have explained the problem well enough (and there were no error messages that appeared - from an R6 point of view, all had worked well) and look forward to hearing from you.
Thanks, Ian