Re: Serious errors betwen Lat/Lon and SPATIAL_REF
This does not look good. :(
I can see errors in a some records in our Recorder 6 database whilst I was mapping out some 10Km data.
By comparing the data in the LAT/LONG and SPATIAL_REFERENCE fields for those records which look in error I obtain these results (The external tool used Recorder's LAT/LONG values to return OSGB).
LAT LONG SPATIAL_REF AS REPORTED IN RECORDER SPATIAL_REF IN EXTERNAL TOOL
===================================================================================
52.265830 -3.314651 SN87 SO10295 63932
52.265830 -3.314651 SO15 SO10295 63932
51.964272 -4.016153 SN63 SN61500 31500
52.335033 -3.892049 SN77 SN71000 72500
Note that the first two are the same LAT/LONG but different grid refs. :/
For comparison, LAT/LONG reported for SN60000 30000 and SN70000 70000 by the external tool is;
SN63 51.950417 -4.037362
SN77 52.312308 -3.907219
I haven't looked at records at other spatial resolution, but I will be doing so. So my question is - has anyone else come across this? I hope this is just limited to 10Km, but I will now need to investigate this.
The trouble is - will the right grid ref please stand up! As far as I know, we have never imported records with LAT/LONG, everything has been provided in OSGB grid refs. But then, if it's a problem with Recorder's conversion, why is it only on some 10Km records and not others?
I have no Idea at the moment....watch this space.
Biodiversity Technology Officer,
Biodiversity Information Service for Powys and Brecon Beacons National Park.