1 Reply by charlesroper

  • charlesroper
  • charlesroper
  • Digital Development Manager
  • Offline
  • From: Field Studies Council
  • Registered: 26-03-2006
  • Posts: 906

Re: Recorder Future Developments

In case you weren't already aware of this, there's a list of potential enhancements to Recorder available for viewing along with a rough estimated cost. Items in bold are currently in active development. The list can be found here:

[ Recorder Future Developments Page ]

Charles

Charles Roper
Digital Development Manager | Field Studies Council
http://www.field-studies-council.org | https://twitter.com/charlesroper | https://twitter.com/fsc_digital

charlesroper's Website

2 Reply by Darwyn Sumner (LERC)

  • Darwyn Sumner (LERC)
  • Veteran
  • Offline
  • Registered: 07-06-2006
  • Posts: 176

Re: Recorder Future Developments

One of the "in progress" topics (CCN144), regarding the export to a variety of formats excludes one format, mif, which I suggested some time ago (http://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?id=302).
Whilst you've got the car bonnet open, do you think you could take a look at this.
The zero responses suggest it wasn't understood and yet it goes some way towards solving the "Missing polygons" (http://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?id=411) issue which CCN144 only perpetuates, as does the "Polygon Linked Reports" and anything similar which is related to the way in which polygons are currently interrogated in Recorder.
Does anyone else understand it, it's exquisitely simple and published on the internet.

3 Reply by Darwyn Sumner

  • Darwyn Sumner
  • Darwyn Sumner
  • Veteran
  • Offline
  • From: Dipterists Forum
  • Registered: 10-05-2006
  • Posts: 250

Re: Recorder Future Developments

That page seems to have moved