Topic: Zero Abundance incorrectly flagged
While producing a recent report we noticed that records with an abundance of "0 count" and any other abundance (for example "0 count of female; 3 count of male" are being marked as negative records.
The initial assumption was that this was due to the zero count going first, however on trying to re-order the abundances the zero was sorted back to the top, and i can find no other way to remove the flag without deleting the 0 count which is a legitimate part of the original record and we would like to retain.
I noticed this post: http://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1149#p1149 referring to flag issues in 2002 but our database has never used this version.
We are using version: 22.214.171.124
Merseyside BioBank - Local Environmental Records Centre for North Merseyside