This specifically refers to the chart of record counts, but may be applicable elsewhere: e.g. https://species.nbnatlas.org/species/NB … 48#records

Would it be beneficial to order the vice-counties by their number rather than name? The numbers for vice-counties were allocated  on a rough geographic basis - it's very crude but ordering by the number would show the "distribution" of these nicely (and be more logical for those familiar with vice-counties; i.e. North and South Lincolnshire next to each other).

(I am undecided about this - a button to switch the ordering would be the perfect solution!)