1

Re: Databases, Naturalists and the Global Biodiversity Convention

Here's a report scrutinising the NBN, Recorder and Mapmate:

Databases, Naturalists and the Global Biodiversity Convention

Here's a brief outline:

This was a one year sociological study (2005-2006) of two of the computerised data frameworks currently used in the UK for gathering data on biological diversity. The first, the National Biodiversity Network (NBN) was designed to collate the UK’s biological records. The second, Mapmate, is a computer software package used by many naturalists. The study involved looking in detail at the software that was initially most closely associated with NBN, ‘Recorder’. The research explored the differences between these two softwares in terms of their design and use and their compatibility with NBN goals. An issue which strongly informed the research was a palpable tension between the policy-led drive to standardise and globalise biological data and the different set of motivations and expectations which drive the disparate members of the UK biological recording community.
The study therefore considered the perceptions and visions of software designers, data contributors and data users. It used participant observation, qualitative interviewing and focus groups with 3 communities: 1) software and database designers, 2) data contributors, 3) database users.

Charles

Charles Roper
Digital Development Manager | Field Studies Council
http://www.field-studies-council.org | https://twitter.com/charlesroper | https://twitter.com/fsc_digital

2

Re: Databases, Naturalists and the Global Biodiversity Convention

Hi Charles

Thank you for posting this up. I hadn't seen this report before and I wasn't involved in the interviews etc. that took place around Recorder.

It's an interesting report and raises some important issues.

However, I would like to emphasise that Recorder isn't soley focussed upon standardisation of data - it aims to improve the quality of data and marry up the standards implemented with the needs of the recording community. I agree that some areas of Recorder (such as the database structure) are complex and some areas of the interface could be improved, but generally speaking the project has responded to requests from the user community, and continues to work with users to improve the package.

Additionally, the ability to share data and retain data ownership isn't just a Mapmate trait - this has always been a fundamental principle behind Recorder.

Best wishes,

Sarah

Sarah Shaw
Biodiversity Information Assistant
JNCC

Sarah Shaw
Biodiversity Information Assistant
JNCC