1

Re: Latest Species Dictionary upgrade available

The NHM Species Dictionary has been updated and the latest upgrade for use with Recorder is available to download with the the new Dictionary Upgrade Kit (V3) from the Recorder website at http://forums.nbn.org.uk/recorderWebsite/dictionaryUpgrades.htm

The new Dictionary upgrade kit V3 has been updated to include a permissions fix for use with Vista - this relates to the automatic request for elevation to the Admin account (if UAC is turned on). If the name of the program contains the word ‘setup’, then Vista automatically requests elevation for the program.  As this is not the case for the DictionaryUpgrade.exe a ‘manifest’ has been added to indicate to Vista what to do.

The species dictionary upgrades 0000000G.sql, 0000000H.zip and 0000000I.sql include:

Tidying up of the Nameserver table and changes to the following checklists:

Additional lists:
'BPGS' checklist,
'SYMPHYTA Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera Symphyta'
'LEPIDOPTERA (MICRO) Porter Micro-Lepidoptera' checklist
'NERC Act 2006. Section 41: Species of Principal Importance in England' checklist
'NERC Act 2006. Section 42: Species of Principal Importance in Wales' checklist

Major update to the 'JNCC Collation of taxon designations' checklist (Now includes: Amber/Red Bird Lists 2009, Vascular plant amendments, W&CA Sch 5:9.4A* and 9.4c, NERC S41, NERC S42, IUCN Global RedList, Conservation Regs 2,3 and 4)

Lists removed: 'JNCC Interpretation of Higher Level Designations', 'Forestry Commission Forester dataset' and 'NHM Working Navigational Hierarchy'

Don't forget to rebuild the three indexes after upgrading, in order, starting with Taxon Group, then Taxon Name and finally Taxon Synonym.

2

Re: Latest Species Dictionary upgrade available

Hi Lynn,

A quick question about the Birds of Conservation Concern (BoCC) 2009 designations: the two new statuses (Bird:Amber/Bird:Red - NHMSYS0020443051/NHMSYS0020443052) have a KIND of Red Data List whereas the older BoCC lists had KINDs of BoCC1996 and BoCC2002. Is the new KIND correct and, if so, what is the reason for the change?

Cheers,
Charles

Charles Roper
Digital Development Manager | Field Studies Council
http://www.field-studies-council.org | https://twitter.com/charlesroper | https://twitter.com/fsc_digital

3

Re: Latest Species Dictionary upgrade available

A good question - within the JNCC collation there was already a newer version of the BOCC lists called Bird:Red and Bird:Amber present in the collation when this new list was added. This existing designation was simply used to point to the new list of species and the old species were archived. the KIND of Red Data List is meant by JNCC in the broadest sense of the term - meaning any list that is frequently referred to as a 'red list' regardless of whether it is based on the IUCN criteria for red listing. The previous KINDS of BOCC1996 and BOCC2002 are now considered inappropriate for types of KIND. If this causes problems we can consider the definition of the KIND as its not set in stone.

Cheers,
Lynn

4

Re: Latest Species Dictionary upgrade available

Thanks for the explanation Lynn. It doesn't cause problems (I think) - I was just curious.

Charles Roper
Digital Development Manager | Field Studies Council
http://www.field-studies-council.org | https://twitter.com/charlesroper | https://twitter.com/fsc_digital