<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forum — Grass snake missing designations]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?id=84</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.nbn.org.uk/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=84&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Grass snake missing designations.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:12:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB 1.4.6</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Grass snake missing designations]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=438#p438</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks John.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (charlesroper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=438#p438</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Grass snake missing designations]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=429#p429</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Charles,</p><p>JNCC are currently looking at designations within Recorder and I shall ensure that this and other related issues are discussed when we next meet.</p><p>John</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (johnt)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 09:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=429#p429</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Grass snake missing designations]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=370#p370</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Looks like there really is a designation or two missing for the grass snake (<em>Natrix natrix</em>). According to my &#039;get designations&#039; XML Report, the grass snake has only a <em>Berne Convention Appendix 3</em> and a <em>Biodiversity Lists - Long List</em> designation. According to the JNCC website&#039;s <a href="http://www.jncc.gov.uk/page-1815">W&amp;CAct page</a>, it should have W&amp;CAct sections 9(1) and 9(5). This is based on the preferred list.</p><p>On a related subject, Mike Weideli pointed out to me to be careful of cases where a species is designated at the group level, but the dictionary doesn&#039;t have the designated group as an ancestor of the species. For example, the taxon <em>Reptilia</em> is designated under the Berne Convention Appendix 3. This means that slow-worms, grass snakes, etc., which are children of <em>Reptilia</em>, are designated too. However, the Recorder 3.3 dictionary does not have the <em>Reptilia</em> node in the taxonomic hierachy and thus the designation cannot apply. This is because the R3.3 dictionary only goes up to the Order level in the hierarchy (<em>Squamata</em>, in the example above).</p><p>So, this is one to watch out for. I&#039;m glad designations are going to be applied at species level in future!</p><p>Charles</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (charlesroper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=370#p370</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
