<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forum — Arion (Arion) sp.]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?id=8033</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.nbn.org.uk/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=8033&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Arion (Arion) sp..]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 10:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB 1.4.6</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Arion (Arion) sp.]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31346#p31346</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for the update :)&nbsp; I guess this will come through to Recorder 6 in the next dictionary update.</p><p>Do you know how to use these options in iRecord?&nbsp; I can&#039;t find any Arion (Arion) available for use, sp or agg, just Arion or Arion agg (or more specific like Arion ater agg).&nbsp; I&#039;m not sure how iRecord implements UKSI - would changes come through instantly (or at least quickly) or do they do periodic updates?&nbsp; If so, would you expect the options to be available once updated?</p><p>I appreciate you&#039;ve &#039;done your bit&#039; here by liaising with Ben and making an appropriate UKSI change and these questions are beyond that, but any insight you have would be really helpful.</p><p>Thanks very much,<br />Lindsay</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Lindsay_FifeNature)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 10:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31346#p31346</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Arion (Arion) sp.]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31331#p31331</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick update - Ben has agreed that, even though they are not technically identical concepts, they will have been used in an identical way so I have renamed the agg. as sp. in the UKSI and we now have a single concept with 2 names which users can choose as they prefer :)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (ChrisR)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 09:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31331#p31331</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Arion (Arion) sp.]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31323#p31323</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much Chris, that would be great.&nbsp; </p><p>Just for context, one of the experts had been using Arion (Arion) sp., while another felt that wasn&#039;t quite right and consulted a higher authority.&nbsp; As the latter is preparing an atlas, they wanted to ensure the nomenclature was correct and up to date.&nbsp; The expert later got back in touch to say that Ben recommends Arion (Arion) sp.</p><p>Looking forward to hearing clarification following your chat with Ben so we know how best to proceed :)&nbsp; Slug taxonomy really can tie you in knots!</p><p>Thanks again,<br />Lindsay</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Lindsay_FifeNature)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 07:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31323#p31323</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Arion (Arion) sp.]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31321#p31321</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I can add it but I&#039;m just a little wary of making 2 concepts that are essentially synonymous. Let me chat with Ben Rowson and see what he thinks :)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (ChrisR)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 13:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31321#p31321</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Arion (Arion) sp.]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31319#p31319</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p><p>Thanks for your response.</p><p>They had specifically requested Arion (Arion) sp. over a Arion (Arion) agg. suggestion.&nbsp; Do you think there&#039;s likely to be any prospect of Arion (Arion) sp. being an option that can be used in iRecord and Recorder 6?&nbsp; If not, I&#039;ll go back to them and explain the situation and see if Arion (Arion) agg. would be acceptable afterall.</p><p>Thanks,</p><p>Lindsay</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Lindsay_FifeNature)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 12:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31319#p31319</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Arion (Arion) sp.]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31316#p31316</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lindsay, I think the taxon you&#039;re looking at it a subgenus and some data-entry forms don&#039;t allow ranks like that to be entered. But have you tried &quot;Arion (Arion) agg.&quot;? That&#039;s a species aggregate around the subgenus and should be equivalent to what you need?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (ChrisR)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 12:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31316#p31316</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Arion (Arion) sp.]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31306#p31306</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Mollusc experts in our area want Arion (Arion) sp. to be used in some situations, as recommended by Ben Rowson.&nbsp; In the online UKSI I&#039;ve found Arion (Arion) A. Férussac, 1819 (<a href="https://www.nhm.ac.uk/our-science/data/uk-species/taxon?tvk=NHMSYS0020528105">https://www.nhm.ac.uk/our-science/data/ … 0020528105</a>), tagged as recommended and accepted.</p><p>However, we can&#039;t seem to use it within Recorder 6.&nbsp; I can find it using the search, but on trying to view the results of the search in the list hierarchy, it gives an error message that it isn&#039;t in the list.</p><p>Similarly, it doesn&#039;t seem to be in iRecord as an option to use either.</p><p>Is this because the listing in the UKSI is tagged as ill-formed or will it be something system specific or other reasons behind this?</p><p>Thanks for your help.</p><p>Lindsay</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Lindsay_FifeNature)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 11:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31306#p31306</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
