<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forum — Zipped .bak files from R6]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?id=8021</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.nbn.org.uk/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=8021&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Zipped .bak files from R6.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 12:20:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB 1.4.6</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Zipped .bak files from R6]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31250#p31250</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes - I&#039;d be interested to know the answer to that one....any ideas Mike??</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (atheta01)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 12:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31250#p31250</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Zipped .bak files from R6]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31246#p31246</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>We have a new off-site backup facility requiring upload of a 2.5GB .bak file. It is manageable, but takes time.</p><p>The .bak file can be zipped to be much smaller, but I see on the web that zipped .bak files can in some cases fail to unzip correctly.</p><p>Is there any problem with using zipped .bak files from R6 as reliable backups?</p><p>Thanks for any insight.</p><p>Murdo</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (HBRG Data Manager)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 14:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31246#p31246</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
