<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forum — Linking Observations to a Location]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?id=7962</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.nbn.org.uk/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=7962&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Linking Observations to a Location.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 20:35:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB 1.4.6</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Linking Observations to a Location]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31100#p31100</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I may well have missed something in the read the docs but i would like to link observations to a database (imported) location on entry. So far as i can tell the only way database location can interact with an observation is via spatial indexing.</p><p>I understand that spatial indexing can pick up intersecting observations but would like to be able to directly attach observations to a location on entry. ideally through the use of a mandatory lookup and unique name/reference on the entry form. This is something we do already and seems more resource efficient than running spatial queries (we have around 1200 sites)?</p><p>I can create the lookup term list but not sure how i can explicitly link that to a boundaried location in the database so if i report on a location the database knows that the observations are for that site.</p><p>I&#039;m sure this has been done before and i&#039;m just missing the guide so any help would be appreciate.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (BDeed)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 20:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=31100#p31100</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
