<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forum — Increase length of MEASUREMENT_TYPE description]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?id=7526</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.nbn.org.uk/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=7526&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Increase length of MEASUREMENT_TYPE description.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 11:09:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB 1.4.6</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Increase length of MEASUREMENT_TYPE description]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=29639#p29639</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I see! I can live without validation (and I suspect it&#039;s not used a great deal by others?).</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (charliebarnes)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 11:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=29639#p29639</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Increase length of MEASUREMENT_TYPE description]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=29638#p29638</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p><p>The&nbsp; same description box is used by all the Term list inputs. The description box would need to be told&nbsp; the length applicable to each Term list. This means either holding the lengths in the code, which could result in maintenance issues or holding them in a table. I suspect the way it was done originally was to avoid this complication. </p><p>Changing the length can be done in a few minutes. Adding the validation is more like a day with testing.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (MikeWeideli)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 10:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=29638#p29638</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Increase length of MEASUREMENT_TYPE description]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=29636#p29636</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mike. Is it not possible to just limit the number of characters that can be entered into the text box (à la survey name)? Or can that only be done with one line inputs?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (charliebarnes)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 08:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=29636#p29636</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Increase length of MEASUREMENT_TYPE description]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=29635#p29635</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I suggest it is changed to 200. Descriptions on the term list are generally TEXT&nbsp; or set at 200. At the moment the field truncates without warning to the length in the table. Validation on this will be a bit tricky and I wonder if it is necessary if the field length is increased.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (MikeWeideli)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 22:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=29635#p29635</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Increase length of MEASUREMENT_TYPE description]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=29634#p29634</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Can the length of the description field in the MEASUREMENT_TYPE table be increased? VARCHAR(50) is too short to write a useful description. TEXT seems overkill, but is in-line with other descriptions.</p><p>Limiting the ui text box to the same length would also be helpful so as not to truncate text entered (which is how I found out about the low length!).</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (charliebarnes)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 16:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=29634#p29634</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
