<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forum — Green Plover/Lapwing inconsistency]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?id=6958</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.nbn.org.uk/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=6958&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Green Plover/Lapwing inconsistency.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 09:32:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB 1.4.6</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Green Plover/Lapwing inconsistency]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=27368#p27368</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Teresa and Charlie</p><p>Thanks for pointing this out.&nbsp; I have raised it with the developer - looks like the preferred common name is not being applied consistently throughout.</p><p>Christine</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (NBN Support)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 09:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=27368#p27368</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Green Plover/Lapwing inconsistency]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=27364#p27364</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think the same issue is occurring with &quot;Continental Goldcrest&quot; (in records) and &quot;Goldcrest&quot; (taxon page)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (charliebarnes)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 14:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=27364#p27364</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Green Plover/Lapwing inconsistency]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=27363#p27363</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I had to think twice when I just saw &quot;Green Plover&quot; in a set of records before recalling that this is another name for Lapwing. I was just wondering why this was the common name given. I haven&#039;t used Recorder 6 for a while but I don&#039;t recall it ever being the recommended common name? Possibly a quirk, or to do with the other remaining taxonomy/Species Inventory issues? What makes me think this is an atlas bug is that if you *search* for Vanellus, the common name given is Lapwing not Green Plover. but all the records say Green Plover.</p><p>e.g. <br /><a href="https://records.nbnatlas.org/occurrences/322e39af-b5c3-4815-aef4-447e73165a7f">https://records.nbnatlas.org/occurrence … 7e73165a7f</a></p><p>Common name&nbsp; &nbsp; Green Plover <br />Supplied common name &quot;Lapwing&quot;</p><p>compared with </p><p><a href="https://species.nbnatlas.org/search/?q=vanellus">https://species.nbnatlas.org/search/?q=vanellus</a></p><p>species: Vanellus vanellus (Linnaeus, 1758)&nbsp; – Lapwing<br />Lapwing, Peewit, Northern Lapwing, Green Plover<br />Taxon group: bird<br />Vanellus vanellus<br />Vanellus vanellus (Linnaeus, 1758)</p><p>see also <a href="https://records.nbnatlas.org/occurrences/search?q=lsid:NBNSYS0000000027">https://records.nbnatlas.org/occurrence … 0000000027</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (TeresaF)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 11:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=27363#p27363</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
