<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forum — 5km square records]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?id=6666</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.nbn.org.uk/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=6666&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in 5km square records.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:15:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB 1.4.6</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: 5km square records]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=25947#p25947</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The ability to handle 5k grid refs would actually be rather useful in maximising precision in relation to historical data if there is a big push to capture these to &#039;push back the baseline&#039; and to engage folk through telling stories and comparing past and present distributions over the next few years.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Steve_Whitbread)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=25947#p25947</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: 5km square records]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=25918#p25918</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>We plumped for the 10km - 5km square are used so infrequently there didn&#039;t seem any point in investigating it further (I think it would require some coding from the Recorder team to get these in - technically quite trivial, but depends on how Recorder interacts with the grid ref)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (charliebarnes)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=25918#p25918</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[5km square records]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=25917#p25917</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,</p><p>My question is about 5km square records (e.g. NT18NE) and how others handle them in Recorder 6.&nbsp; It&#039;s not a precision / format that Recorder 6 handles as far as I can tell - though to be fair, it&#039;s also not an issue I recall coming up before in the various organisations I&#039;ve used Recorder!</p><p>It&#039;s apparent that at some point, some 5km square records have been input (or there have been attempts to input them) into some incarnation of the database - now sitting in Recorder 6.&nbsp; How these are currently being expressed is the south west 1km square of the 5km square (e.g. NT1585 for NT18NE).&nbsp; I&#039;m not sure whether this was a decision at the point of input or an automatic conversion with database change (e.g. if a previous incarnation of the database accepted the 5km square records as 5km square records or if it was possible to assign a precision of 5000 to a 1km square).</p><p>Assuming (hoping?!) that someone else will have come across this, I was wondering if you&#039;d found an acceptable way round it (or a sneaky way to have a 5km square recognised in Recorder?) or if you&#039;ve just plumped for expressing it one way or another, be it the 1km square at the south west corner or the 10km square, etc.?</p><p>Thanks very much for any thoughts!</p><p>Linds</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Lindsay_FifeNature)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=25917#p25917</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
