<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forum — Reporting from Rucksack - spurious taxa]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?id=542</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.nbn.org.uk/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=542&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Reporting from Rucksack - spurious taxa.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:33:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB 1.4.6</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Reporting from Rucksack - spurious taxa]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=2488#p2488</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alan</p><p>I think what is happening here is that if you have any entries in the rucksack that are above<em> F.incurva </em>(taxonomically) and you select to include all taxa from list (with &#039;current rucksack&#039; or &#039;current rucksack (expanded)&#039; selected), the report wizard expands the rucksack taxonomically and produces a report containing all taxa (including ones such as F.incurva that weren&#039;t specifically included in the rucksack).</p><p>However, if you select specific taxa from the rucksack the report produced is restricted to the specific taxa selected and isn&#039;t expanded taxonomically.</p><p>Perhaps the second example you give does signify some incorrect synonymy within the dictionary but I&#039;ve been unable to reproduce this - I&#039;ve created a rucksack containing &#039;Pottiales&#039; from the BRYOPHYTE checklist. I have added 4 records -&nbsp; 1 of <em>Weissia levieri </em>using the BRYOPHYTE checklist, 1 of <em>Weissia levieri </em>using the Rec 3 list, 1 of <em>Weissia longifolia </em>using the BRYOPHYTE list and 1 of <em>Weissia longifolia </em>using the Rec 3 list.</p><p>However, if I do a report just selecting <em>Weissia levieri </em>only from the rucksack I just get the 2 appropriate records returned and not those of <em>Weissia longifolia</em>.</p><p>If you could provide me with a copy of the rucksack you are using I could do some further checking - and if there are any problems with the synonymy I can report this back to the NHM.</p><p>Best wishes,</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Sarah Shaw)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=2488#p2488</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Reporting from Rucksack - spurious taxa]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=2467#p2467</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve constructed a rucksack which comprises all the UKBAP/Section 42 &quot;lower plant&quot; species that occur in Wales. For the bryophytes I based the rucksack entries on the preferred bryophyte dictionary. But I&#039;ve found something odd when I report from the rucksack using the Report Wizard.</p><p>Fossombronia foveolata is in the rucksack, Fossombronia incurva is not. As far as I am aware there is not nor has been any synonymy of these two species. If I run a report on the rucksack, ticking the &quot;All Taxa from List&quot; box, I get no records of F. foveolata reported (rightly, because I don&#039;t have any) but I DO get a records of F.incurva reported (they were originally input using the Recorder 3.3 list).</p><p>If I&nbsp; run a report on F.foveolata only (i.e. not ticking &quot;All Taxa from List&quot;) from the rucksack, I get no records of either species (as expected). I get the same result if I report on F. foveolata from the Recorder 3.3 list.</p><p>There is a similar issue with Weissias. W. levieri and W.squarrosa are in my rucksack, W.longifolia is not. But if I report ticking &quot;All taxa from List&quot; I get records of W.longifolia as well as records of the two others. In this case though I find that if I report on W.levieri alone I also get W.longifolia (I expect this is all as clear as mud by now). Again, there is no synonymy taht I am aware of involved here.</p><p>Does anyone have any idea what might be going on here?</p><p>Thanks</p><p>Alan</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Alan Hale)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=2467#p2467</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
