<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forum — Complex filter editing inconsistencies (6.7.2.77)]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?id=35</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.nbn.org.uk/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=35&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Complex filter editing inconsistencies (6.7.2.77).]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 12:52:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB 1.4.6</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Complex filter editing inconsistencies (6.7.2.77)]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=122#p122</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Charles.&nbsp; I&#039;ve added it to the incident tracking system (ID 11920) to fix for the next release.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (johnvanbreda)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 12:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=122#p122</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Complex filter editing inconsistencies (6.7.2.77)]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=115#p115</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I spotted some weird inconsistencies and strangeness in the behaviour of the complex filter dialog today:</p><p>1) When clicking the <strong>edit</strong> button on an existing textual filter (as opposed to a date filter), the criterion field doesn&#039;t get re-populated with the filter text, and the selection in the Available Fields list defaults back to Event Date (at the top of the list). Having to re-specify both the field and the filter makes the edit function somewhat redundance, i.e. it&#039;s just as easy to delete the old filter and add a new one.</p><p>2) When clicking the edit button on an existing date value, the criterion field <strong>is</strong> re-populated with the existing date(s), but again, the Available Fields selection defaults back to Event Date. It&#039;s when editing a date in this fashion, it&#039;s extremely easy for a user to miss the fact that the field has defaulted back to Event Date.</p><p>Charles</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (charlesroper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 09:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=115#p115</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
