<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forum — Ladybirds]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?id=288</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.nbn.org.uk/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=288&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Ladybirds.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:21:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB 1.4.6</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ladybirds]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1359#p1359</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Charles,</p><p>Yes, the latter. Around half of the list is already in Recorder 6 and I&#039;ve recently received permission to include the remaining families, including the ladybirds. Addition of these families was delayed as they were undergoing major revisions.</p><p>John</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (johnt)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1359#p1359</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ladybirds]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1358#p1358</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>John, I was under the impression that it already had been incorporated as it&#039;s in my copy of R6. Or do you mean the <strong>rest</strong> of the Coleoptera list will be incorporated? According to your last update PDF, only half of the Coleoptera list was complete at that time.</p><p>Charles</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (charlesroper)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1358#p1358</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ladybirds]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1354#p1354</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>John,</p><p>That&#039;s great. Many thanks.</p><p>Brian</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (brianmiller)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1354#p1354</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ladybirds]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1353#p1353</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p><p>Thank you for pointing this out. The Recorder 3 dictionary is now very out of date and is not being updated. However, the good news is that the full British Isles beetle checklist, as available via The Coleopterist website <a href="http://www.coleopterist.org.uk/">http://www.coleopterist.org.uk/</a>, will be incorporated within the next two months. It will then be made available to Recorder users, so will probably be in one of the next two upgrades.</p><p>This will hopefully sort all of the beetle problems.</p><p>Kind regards,<br />John</p><p>Dr John Tweddle<br />Data Manager, NBN Species Dictionary Project</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (johnt)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1353#p1353</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Ladybirds]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1352#p1352</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Am I mistaken or is there an error in the Recorder 3 dictionary? This seems to be the only dictionary with the 16-spot ladybird.</p><p>However, in there it is listed as both Tytthaspis sedecimpunctata and Halyzia sedecimguttata.</p><p>In the Naturalists&#039; Handbooks and on the following website</p><p>http://www.ladybird-survey.org/UKladybirds/UKladybirds.htm</p><p>it says:</p><p>Tytthaspis 16-punctata is 16 spot ladybird (sci. is a synonym in Recorder to Tytthaspis sedecimpunctata)</p><p>and:</p><p>Halyzia 16-guttata is Orange Ladybird (sci. is a synonym in Recorder to Halyzia sedecimguttata, but is not called Orange Ladybird).</p><p>Are names in Recorder 3 updated still or are they now not going to be due to the preferred lists being there (although this species does not seem to be elsewhere)?</p><p>Thanks</p><p>Brian</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (brianmiller)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1352#p1352</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
