<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Forum — V6.9.3 UPGRADE RELEASED]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?id=230</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.nbn.org.uk/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=230&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in V6.9.3 UPGRADE RELEASED.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:51:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB 1.4.6</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: V6.9.3 UPGRADE RELEASED]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1379#p1379</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The dictionary synchroniser tool is now working. We have only used it on a couple of databases so far, so a small amount of further work may be required.</p><p>Once we have used this on a few more databases, we will supply the dictionary synchroniser tool to Dorset Software and the other resellers. </p><p>When upgrading and updating the dictionary, please use the guidance provided on the uploads page of the forum, see &#039;Guidelines for upgrading V6.6.8 to V6.9.3 by Sarah Shaw, JNCC&#039; at <a href="http://forums.nbn.org.uk/uploads.php">http://forums.nbn.org.uk/uploads.php</a> for reference.</p><p>If you do experience problems with updating the dictionary similar to those above, please contact your reseller, post something on the forum or contact JNCC via the Recorder email address: Recorder@JNCC.gov.uk.</p><p>I&#039;ll will post more information on the synchroniser tool shortly and will let you know when this tool has been provided to the resellers. </p><p>Many thanks,</p><p>Sarah</p><p>Sarah Shaw<br />Biodiversity Information Assistant<br />JNCC</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Sarah Shaw)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1379#p1379</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: V6.9.3 UPGRADE RELEASED]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1302#p1302</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Sarah</p><p>Yes we have a backup, and await the release of the tool.</p><p>Thanks</p><p>Sydney Gauld<br />Orkney Biodiversity Records Centre</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Sydney Gauld)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1302#p1302</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: V6.9.3 UPGRADE RELEASED]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1301#p1301</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p><p>These problems appeared to have occurred as some user&#039;s dictionaries are out of sync - i.e. not everyone&#039;s copy of the dictionary appears to be the same.</p><p>If the user&#039;s copy of the dictionary is not in line with the one we based this latest upgrade on, this causes problems and error messages similar to the one you have posted.</p><p>We are currently working on a solution to this - where ourselves, Dorset Software and the resellers can run a program which can resolve this and bring everyone&#039;s dictionaries to a single point.</p><p>We are hoping that this tool will be ready to use by the end of the week. However, you may need to send us your database on CD so that we can &#039;fix&#039; it.</p><p>Is this a live copy? Did you back up the database before proceeding with the update?</p><p>Best wishes,</p><p>Sarah</p><p>Sarah Shaw<br />Biodiversity Information Assistant<br />JNCC</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Sarah Shaw)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1301#p1301</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: V6.9.3 UPGRADE RELEASED]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1297#p1297</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I had this problem on a standalone install and upgrade from 668 to 672 to 693 and tracked most of it down to <em>not</em> having Imported the Rec6v6_7_2.zip file which was with the 668 to 672 upgrade.&nbsp; Doing the correct steps I was able to get it to not produce this error, but when I came to rebuild the Taxon Name Index after the 693 upgrade it failed to this. So not much help really. However, this was not a live database so I was not left not being able to do anything and I think there are problems that it still does not work properly even if you import the Rec6v6_7_2.zip at the later stage.</p><p>Sarah or Steve should be able to fill in more.</p><p>Brian</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (brianmiller)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 10:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1297#p1297</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: V6.9.3 UPGRADE RELEASED]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1295#p1295</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve</p><p>We ran the dictionary upgrade for V6.9.3 on Friday and got the error message:</p><p>Error occurred running script 00000003.sql. The error is described as:<br />DELETE statement conflicted with COLUMN REFERENCE constraint &#039;FK_TAXON_FACT_TAXON_VERSION&#039;. The conflict occurred in database &#039;NBNData&#039; table &#039;TAXON_FACT&#039; column &#039;TAXON_VERSION_KEY&#039;</p><p>I see from the forum that this problem has been encountered before. What do we have to do to sort it?.</p><p>Sydney Gauld<br />Orkney Biodiversity Records Centre</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Sydney Gauld)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1295#p1295</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: V6.9.3 UPGRADE RELEASED]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1124#p1124</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>All,<br />Further to Sarahs post I dont think we have quite bottomed out the problems around this. I would like to thank Ian for his patience and John VB for help. It looks like there is a problem which has existed through the last four versions of Recorder 6 which has just come to light where the dictionary upgrades will not work completely if you are using the NBNuser account rather than trusted authentication.<br />Unfortunately we cant do anything more about this before Christmas but will pick it up again immediately we are back in in January. The solution is not too complex but just needs a bit of testing and guidance to make sure we get it right.<br />Many thanks for bearing with us through this.<br />Hope you all have a great Christmas and New Year<br />Steve</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (wilkin_s)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1124#p1124</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: V6.9.3 UPGRADE RELEASED]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1114#p1114</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone</p><p>I have looked into the issues raised with the &#039;upgrade from any version&#039; to version 6.9.3, and it looks like there are some problems with upgrading Recorder 6 pre 6.7.2 straight to 6.9.3. There have been so many changes, both with the software and with the dictionary, that this upgrade isn&#039;t working as it should, and I think, on reflection, it is probably better to do the upgrade in two steps anyway (i.e. from 6.6.8 to 6.7.2, and then from 6.7.2 - 6.9.3) to avoid complications. We do however plan to review this situation in the new year.</p><p>I have uploaded a document (see uploads page <a href="http://forums.nbn.org.uk/uploads.php">http://forums.nbn.org.uk/uploads.php</a>) &#039;Guidelines for upgrading to V6.9.3 from V6.6.8&#039; giving detailed instructions of how to upgrade a standalone copy of Recorder 6 from V6.6.8 to V6.9.3 and I hope to provide similar guidelines for upgrading from versions pre 6.6.8 to 6.9.3 (if required) in January.</p><p>As always, particularly with live systems, I would strongly advise creating a back-up copy of the NBN database before proceeding with an upgrade.</p><p>I sincerely apologise for any inconvenience caused by this.</p><p>Many thanks,</p><p>Sarah</p><p>Sarah Shaw<br />Biodiversity Information Assistant<br />JNCC</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Sarah Shaw)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1114#p1114</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: V6.9.3 UPGRADE RELEASED]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1111#p1111</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi John</p><p>Many thanks for the information you give. When you speak with the BOU, I know from my perspective there is a need to differentiate between White and Pied Wagtails for reporting purposes as one only appears here as a migrant the latter as a breeder. I guess this will be an issue for different species in other places, but for my example, it is the only case I can think of where the species name is a change from the one we normally and commonly record in north east Wales (and Britain?). Observers generally record &#039;Pied Wagtails&#039; and we need to be able to differentiate them in Recorder - as a subspecies would be better than just as a comment.</p><p>I look forward to seeing what the upgrade in January does.</p><p>All the best and best wishes for Christmas to those kind people who have provided help via these very useful pages!</p><p>Ian</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Ian M Spence)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1111#p1111</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: V6.9.3 UPGRADE RELEASED]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1110#p1110</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear all,</p><p>I&#039;ve a couple of quick points relating to the taxonomic aspects of the update. Sadly, neither is ideal, but now that the Dictionary updates have been decoupled from broader updates, we are able to provide a much more responsive service.</p><p>Firstly, an apology - the BOU birds list has now been updated in the master copy of the Species Dictionary (held at the NHM) to comply with the latest BOU publication. Unfortunately, the flag that lets Recorder know that this had happened wasn&#039;t completed, so the current Recorder version will not contain all of the changes. This includes the sort order, which will be a little idiosyncratic in places. </p><p>We are aiming for an update in the first week of January and this will solve all problems raised by Ian, with the exception of including subspecies (we had been asked by BOU to omit these, but I shall check that this is still the case).</p><p>The second point relates to the Coleoptera list. This is still only partially complete, but I am pursuing access to the remaining data.</p><p>The intention is to provide regular taxonomic updates, starting in January.</p><p>Regards,<br />John</p><p>Dr John Tweddle</p><p>Data Manager,<br />NBN Species Dictionary Project</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (johnt)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1110#p1110</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: V6.9.3 UPGRADE RELEASED]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1108#p1108</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Janet and Alison</p><p>There is a problem with the instructions that go along with the upgrade from any version. </p><p>My sincerest apologies - we&#039;ve taken this upgrade off the website temporarily and we are looking into it today.</p><p>I&#039;ll email you both as soon as it is resolved.</p><p>I&#039;m really sorry for any inconvenience caused.</p><p>Best wishes,</p><p>Sarah</p><p>Sarah Shaw<br />Biodiversity Information Assistant<br />JNCC</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Sarah Shaw)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1108#p1108</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: V6.9.3 UPGRADE RELEASED]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1106#p1106</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p><p>I have found another taxonomic issue with the implementation of the BOU Checklist 2006. In the taxonomic list is:</p><p>Pied Wagtail (Motacilla alba).&nbsp; This is incorrect. The species is White Wagtail (Motacilla alba)</p><p>What would be better is if the entry could be amended to:</p><p>White Wagtail (Motacilla alba alba) with a subspecies Pied Wagtail (Motacilla alba yarrellii)</p><p>How soon is it realistically likely to be possible to make these changes to the order? Does it have to be done centrally, or can we make such changes locally?</p><p>Cheers, Ian</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Ian M Spence)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 17:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1106#p1106</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: V6.9.3 UPGRADE RELEASED]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1105#p1105</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p><p>I have found another taxonomic issue with the implementation of the BOU Checklist 2006. In the taxonomic list is:</p><p>Pied Wagtail (Motacilla alba).&nbsp; This is incorrect. The species is White Wagtail (Motacilla alba)</p><p>What would be better is if the entry could be amended to:</p><p>White Wagtail (Motacilla alba alba) with a subspecies Pied Wagtail (Motacilla alba yarrellii)</p><p>How soon is it realistically likely to be possible to make these changes to the order? Does it have to be done centrally, or can we make such changes locally?</p><p>Cheers, Ian</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Ian M Spence)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 17:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1105#p1105</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: V6.9.3 UPGRADE RELEASED]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1103#p1103</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi </p><p>My thanks to Steve Wilkinson for his assistance by phone on Friday. I look forward to completing the checks next week.</p><p>Although the dictionary upgrade did not complete, here, the BOU checklist is available - for which I am very grateful and I have imported about 1100 records as a test. Much more such work to do. However, there are some errors in the contents of the list that I would be grateful to have corrected at some time. The most striking error is the order is wrong at the start of the taxonomic list. Mute Swan is now the first bird in the list and the order should be:</p><p>Anseriformes<br />Galliformes<br />Gaviiformes<br />Podicipediformes<br />Procellariiformes<br />Pelecaniformes<br />Ciconiiiformes<br />Acciptriformes, etc etc </p><p>There may be some other &#039;order&#039; issues to check.</p><p>Also, &#039;Canada Goose&#039; should now be named &#039;Greater Canada Goose&#039;.</p><p>However, many thanks for getting this list available!</p><p>All the best, Ian</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Ian M Spence)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 07:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1103#p1103</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: V6.9.3 UPGRADE RELEASED]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1102#p1102</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Not quite the same, Alison&#039;s import seems to have got further than mine as there is nothing in my ImportRejects.txt. LastError.txt shows:</p><p>Exception occurred in application Recorder 6 at 15/12/2006 15-04-25.<br />Version : 6.9.3.102</p><p>Exception path:<br />EOleException : ClassFactory cannot supply requested class</p><p>Last event\actions: <br />&nbsp; actLocations invoked<br />&nbsp; TfrmLocations created<br />&nbsp; TfrmLocations activated<br />&nbsp; TfrmLocationDetails created<br />&nbsp; actImport invoked<br />&nbsp; TfrmImportWizard created<br />&nbsp; TfrmLocations deactivated<br />&nbsp; TfrmImportWizard activated</p><p>Operating System : Windows XP&nbsp; 5.01.2600&nbsp; Service Pack 2<br />Physical Memory available : 1,047,548 KB</p><p>Janet</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Janet Simkin)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1102#p1102</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: V6.9.3 UPGRADE RELEASED]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1101#p1101</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I appear to have an identical problem to Janet.&nbsp; The resulting ImportRejects.txt from importing Rec6V6_6_8.zip lists 23900 items rejected all of the following format, e.g.</p><p>Failed to insert NBNSYS0000001349 into NAMESERVER<br />Database Error Message: <br />UPDATE permission denied on object &#039;NAMESERVER&#039;, database &#039;NBNDATA&#039;, owner &#039;dbo&#039;.</p><br /><p>Alison</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Alison Stewart)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=1101#p1101</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
