<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Forum — Taxon versions]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forums.nbn.org.uk/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=161&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2006-10-11T16:43:01Z</updated>
	<generator version="1.4.6">PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?id=161</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Taxon versions]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=805#p805" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>There&#039;s no problem - I was just trying to understand how the taxon dictionary worked as I only had a superficial knowledge of it. The fact I found the Dotterel error is incidental. I&#039;ve not installed the latest dictionary updates (the update that should hopefully come about 6.9.3 time), which I would assume contains the Dotterel fix?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[charlesroper]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/profile.php?id=80002</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2006-10-11T16:43:01Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=805#p805</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Taxon versions]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=800#p800" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Charles<br />Sorry - but I cant quite get my head around this. Broadly what you have written is correct - ie. there may be different preferred common names depending on the list. I guess what I need to know is whether this is expected behavour or not - ie. is what you are raising here a problem?<br />The bit that does worry me is the Dotterel bit. I thought I had fixed this and on my copy here I cant see any problem. Can you just confirm what the error you are getting is?<br />Many thanks<br />STeve</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[wilkin_s]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/profile.php?id=3</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2006-10-11T09:09:17Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=800#p800</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Taxon versions]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=787#p787" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve been looking into some of the finer points of the taxon dictionary and have a query regarding taxon versions. For the sake of example, I&#039;ll use the <strong>otter</strong> (<em>Lutra lutra</em>). The otter appears on 20 lists (at present) and appears in three versions, i.e. it has three TAXON_VERSION_KEYS that I can find:</p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>NBNSYS0000005133
NBNSYS0000169293
NHMSYS0000332266</code></pre></div><p>The first of those keys -- NBNSYS0000005133 -- appears on all 20 lists, while the other two appear 3 times and once respectively. Some of the taxon versions appear within a taxon list twice. E.g. both NHMSYS0000332266 (European Otter) and NBNSYS0000005133 (Otter) on the MAMMALIA checklist, with the preferred_name in this case being the European Otter. Thus in cases such as this, the &#039;European Otter&#039; version is what appears in the checklist, while the plain &#039;Otter&#039; version is hidden.</p><p>The taxon version that is NBNSYS0000169293 appears to be a mistake (it&#039;s a Dotterel!).</p><p>So, first, have I got my thinking correct in all of this?</p><p>Secondly, given that NBNSYS0000169293 (the Dotterel) is a mistake, does the newest version of the otter (NHMSYS0000332266 - the European Otter) signify the split and name change from the old &#039;Otter&#039; to the newer &#039;European Otter&#039;?</p><p>Hope all that makes sense to someone. :)</p><p>Charles</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[charlesroper]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/profile.php?id=80002</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2006-10-06T16:42:02Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.nbn.org.uk/viewtopic.php?pid=787#p787</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
